h1

Many noticed, few listened

January 17, 2008

I’m guessing that there are many, many people who have been employed as “worship leaders” or other kinds of leadership– lay, staff, or otherwise — over the past couple decades who might concur with these observations. What follows is not “news.” But read on if you must…

As the well-intentioned  ”seeker sensitive”  movement and its propositions/assumptions about what will attract people to church so they will hear the gospel was broadcast across the evangelical church, those churches concerned that they were not measuring up to growth expectations and accepted said propositions/assumptions  started listening up and making changes in the way they ‘did church.’  Here’s what I began to see in those churches I worked in that began to make this switch:

1) Attempts to incorporate highly-produced contemporary music into the worship services  - without any professional players on hand

2) Attempts to incorporate drama – without competent, experienced thespians available.

3) Thousands of dollars invested in A/V equipment to support the above, and to broadcast Willow-provided video when the above proved to be driving people away due to its lack of slick professionalism (go figure).

4) Pastors preaching sermon after Sunday sermon directed toward “seekers” …that weren’t there !

5) People who used to teach bible studies and other kinds of small group experiences recruited for drama, clicking PowerPoint slides, “servant evangelism” events (the seeker-sensitive version of product promotion – not to be confused with the kind of servant evangelism where the recipient doesn’t know what church you’re representing as you serve) and other kinds of newly created positions.

6) “Spiritual Gifts” inventories distributed that promised to determine where to place people in personally-rewarding kinds of busyness –  which oddly enough landed most people up in volunteering to do something related to putting on the new brand of Sunday production…

7) Due to all of the above, decreasing numbers of  “satisfied,” mature followers of Christ…  and a slow trickle out the back door. Most really tried; but they just didn’t seem to “fit in” any more.   They were called “immature” or “selfish” of course  as they left ( for not buying in to the program). And it’s possible  some were selfish — but maybe not for that reason…

8 ) Replacement of those who left with people who did “fit in” and in many cases, exponential growth as a new kind of person was attracted to the new kind of Sunday gathering.

Churches that followed Willow Creek’s model are now largely populated with a “certain kind” of  christian.  The model does what it does. You get the kind of church you nurture. Its a really important principle. Who you drive away and why  is as significant as who you “attract”  –and why.

Now I come from a background where we were already singing contemporary songs in our worship gatherings, and if there was “drama” it was when the pastor reached a particularly “heavy” section of scripture and some “seekers” were moved by the Spirit of God to repent and be saved! Servant evangelism wasn’t “new” — but nobody carried around bottles of water with church business-cards attached to them either.  It was pretty low-tech, too, for a long time. It just wasn’t on the radar screen to produce slick events in order to attract the unsaved. I guess we figured that the unsaved might want to come to church for other reasons — for instance, that the equipped, nurtured, healthy believers attending the church would naturally invite others to their wonderful church!

“Healthy sheep reproduce,” was the adage.  I think its a very good one.

I know there are many views on spiritual gifts. I happen to be a person who believes God bestows spiritual gifts along with the indwelling of the Spirit,  when a person is “born from above” (John 3:3 ) and that these gifts relate directly to the development, nurture, maturation and longevity of the Church.  The gifts are given to people who have been joined to the body of Christ, and these gifts and are expressed in and through people.  The  church is a “body” — a metaphor given to us in Scripture that helps us understand the way this works.  The gifts are like body parts and the Spirit of God ligaments that hold them all together in unity and healthy functionality. Jesus is the head of this “body.”As bodies go,  healthy churches are those that are mindful of and adhere to what has already been said about what makes for a healthy body. For example, here are some  healthy practices.

Is anyone listening today? I am encouraged that yes, there seem to be…

4 comments

  1. The Christian in the pew is rising up and saying enough is enough, I believe. They are beginning to demand Sr Pastors who teach the Bible, changes that honor classic Christianity, and gatherings that are not so much attractional as authentic. We are all being left empty, mostly because the promise of the seeker model hasn’t delivered. It attracts but keeps Christianity lite. What you win them with we have found is what you keep them with. You can’t change the rules after the game has started. A lot of pastors who deeply believe in evangelism and sincerely seek to draw others to Christ have found that you can’t give them Christ without giving them the church. Seeker churches have tried that – it doesn’t work.


  2. Don,

    GREAT comment…

    peace,
    -Susan


  3. Susan:
    I think your most profound thought comes in a single sentence – “You get the kind of church you nurture.”

    Still, I’ve been wondering lately whether the megachurch, seeker sensitive model has its place in the movement of the kingdom. Throughout the history our faith, going all the way back to Moses, there have always been winnowing times when God reserved a remnant of faithful from among the masses. When the megachurch movement emerged on the scene they WERE the remnant. Now there is a new remnant emerging. Not to say that we shouldn’t still rail against excesses we see in those churches. Where would we be without an occasional strident voice calling out in the wilderness? I just smile wondering whether we’ve been here before.


  4. Hi Ron,

    We have been here before, many times over; but I would not be one to suggest that those who came up with the “seeker sensitive” model were some kind of “remnant of the faithful” that emerged from a time of “winnowing.”

    Neither would I suggest, however, that “new models” of “doing church” coming out of the “emerging” movement are all innovations of the “remnant faithful” either.

    Some “emerging” aspects of what began as genuinely fresh movements of God are merely the result of the energies of those who co-opt and turn a profit (whether that profit be personal celebrity, significance, or financial gain) There are some people who are involved in new movements who are doing nothing more than catching the latest wave before their own boats bottom out in a sand-bar.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.